The agreements also provide for rules on the uniform application and interpretation of the above-mentioned provisions, the settlement of disputes, the consequences of changes to the Prüm legal framework and relations with other cross-border cooperation agreements. Before the entry into force of the agreements, the EU, on the one hand, and Switzerland and Liechtenstein, on the other, must inform themselves of the conclusion of the necessary procedures to express their consent to accession to the agreements. 25As regards the Prüm decisions, the bilateral agreements which many European and other countries have concluded to link their databases to the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) of the United States. In 2014, Belgium, Austria, Switzerland, the Czech Republic, Germany, the Netherlands, Finland, Spain, Estonia, Greece, Denmark and South Korea were known to have such agreements with the United States, but DNA has not yet been exchanged (see [61]). The likely extension of the breadth and depth of prüm`s next generation and the increasing advent of prâneurs chords illustrate how Prüm is a „suction regime“. However, these uses are „ambitious“ because they are constantly evolving and require additional investments in physical infrastructure, including software, laboratory facilities, paperwork, and (legal) rules and standards, and because they target future objectives such as crime prevention, state security and public safety ([19]: 12). However, the desired nature of the extension of the Prüm regime – either the amendments to the existing rules or the extension to other countries – is based on a general lack of available, relevant, accurate and comparable data, which allow a concrete objective, independent and systematic analysis of the contribution of the Prüm regime to the fight against cross-border crime and terrorism. and potentially illegal immigration by the CCP SEE….