A practical understanding of the different financial instruments. From pre-award decision to post-award management, you will explore key elements of both grants and cooperation agreements, including the active participation of the federal agency itself. You also have the option to ask your own questions during the Q-A part of the webinar. A Service Level Contract (SLA) is an agreement between a customer (the Agency in this context) and a service provider that describes the service, documents performance targets at the service level, encourages performance targets, clarifies the responsibilities of the service provider and the customer, describes how it will detect and handle disputes, and determines how it should correct performance defects. The process of executing an ALS is a business transaction between a customer and a service provider. The benefits described in alS are paid for by the Agency. However, unlike a grant or cooperation contract, an ALS is not a funding or commitment document. That is why we do not include ALS in this calendar. Prior to her advice, Sandra Senior Policy was an analyst at OMB, where she oversaw the development of Grants.gov and scholarships. After omb and in the private sector, Sandra returned to government, where she was data manager and senior advisor for financial policy on the Board of Directors of Accountability and Transparency. The federal government has implemented several of its board-of-directors reporting initiatives. She led the Recovery Board project, which demonstrated the government`s financial assistance reports, which formed the basis for the Section V pilot project of the DATA Act. In general, “substantial participation” refers to the degree to which federal officials directly execute or implement parts of the allocation program.
In the case of a grant, the federal government maintains a more strict oversight and oversight function. In a cooperation agreement, federal officials are therefore more involved in the implementation of the program. If you read “cooperative,” think about working “side by side.” The specific possibilities for integrating this participation vary according to the program and the agency. Here, for example, is a cooperation agreement of the Department of Geological Survey of the Interior (USGS). This is a cooperative funding opportunity for research and technical assistance, which is provided in the form of a cooperation agreement and not a grant. The laureate will work closely with USGS staff and researchers to improve scientific computing and visualization capabilities through the search for new large-scale computer tools, methods and data management techniques. Based on a study of how agencies planned these records and the experience of these applications in our stocks, we found that they generally did not warrant sustainable conservation. When an agency believes that the products or services of the award or cooperation agreement justify sustainable conservation by the National Archives, it may apply for a deviation from the GRS with a specific timetable proposed to the agency. Hey, Sean, can you explain what you mean by “data possession”? Thank you! Subsidies and cooperation agreements are not the same, and the differences affect every step of the fund-seeking process, from pre-allocation to post-price. Hello, Johnnie, you have to look, so apply for federal grants. In blog.grants.gov/2016/06/22/exploring-eligibility-individuals-seeking-grants-for-house-repairs/ this one-hour webinar, Sandra Swab, a promotional advisor, explains how grants and cooperation agreements are the same and in what key areas they differ. You will discover the impact of these differences on fundraising in the context of uniform guidance and your unique program.