Project Labor Agreement Nj
In addition to increased project costs, studies have shown that PPPs can result in higher costs for non-union contractors and reduce the compensation of their home employees. A 2009 study was conducted by John R. McGowan of St. Louis University, who found that non-unionist workers earn lower wages in government projects with a PLA compared to what they would get to work on a non-governmental PLA project. In addition, non-unionized employers should pay additional benefits for which their employees are not eligible and which could be liable for the liability costs of withdrawal of pension funds if the conditions of the AEPs mean that they must contribute to a union pension fund during the duration of the project.  In 1997, Clinton proposed an executive order that requires federal authorities to consider the use of LTOs for Federally funded projects.  Republicans strongly opposed it and believed it would limit federal projects to union entrepreneurs alone. Clinton abandoned the executive proposal, but issued a memorandum on June 5, 1997 inviting federal departments to consider the use of LTOs for „large and important“ projects.  The memorandum required government authorities to re-extend each project to decide whether a PLA would allow the authority to increase efficiency and reduce costs.  The agreements have been used in the United States since the 1930s and were first discussed in the 1980s for their use in publicly funded projects. In these cases, the public authorities have made the signing of ATPs a prerequisite for working on taxpayer-funded projects. This type of ALP, known as a government-mandated ALP, is different from a PLA that is voluntarily carried out by public or private works contractors – as NNRA allows – and a PLA that has been mandated by a private agency for a privately funded construction project.
Executive orders adopted since 1992 have had an impact on the use of mandatory PLAs for federal construction projects, and the last order issued by President Barack Obama in February 2009 encourages their use by federal authorities. The use of PLA is rejected by a number of groups that claim that the agreements discriminate 30/10 contractors and do not improve efficiency or reduce the costs of construction projects.