Since reciprocity is at the origin of any legally binding agreement, a treaty requires a meeting of the minds of the parties on all essential issues affecting it (consensus ad idem). However, instead of trying to find the true subjective intent of each party, the courts have generally applied the reason man`s uninsted and objective test. Therefore, regardless of a party`s actual intent, it acts when it acts in such a way that a reasonable person believes that the party is committing itself under the terms proposed by the other party, and if the other party objects to an agreement with it, an enforceable contract will come into effect. For a contract to be binding, it is necessary for the parties to reach the same decision, which must be made available in writing or by written words or by any other memorandum of understanding that may result in the involvement of the law or the conclusion of facts or both. In summary, contract law describes the conclusion of a contract in the form of rules that govern and define the process of contract formation. A contract shall be concluded only on the existence of a final tender and full and unreserved acceptance of the tender notified to the tenderer. However, there is also a general rule that a court should, to the extent possible, interpret a contract in such a way that it works. A contract is an equity agreement. This can be a written or oral agreement.
In the absence of an agreement to the contrary, the parties to a commercial contract are free to assign their obligations to subcontractors without obtaining the agreement of the other party. However, unless otherwise specified in the agreement, the original contracting parties are liable for their obligations under the contract, whether or not they have been assigned to subcontractors. Where a provisional agreement is concluded as a result of oral or distance negotiations, the intention of the parties is to determine whether the establishment and performance of a formal contractual document untying the entire agreement is a condition precedent for the conclusion of a binding contract or a negligible means of registering a contract already concluded. In practice, this depends in the first place on whether or not all the main contractual conditions are agreed. Even if the parties intend to enter into a contract, the essential terms of the agreement must be agreed upon and have a sufficient degree of clarity before a legally binding agreement can be concluded. Therefore, if an agreement is incomplete because essential elements are not regulated or if the agreement is too general or uncertain to be valid in itself, or if the parties understand that their legal obligations must be deferred until the performance of a formal contract, no binding contract has been concluded, even if the parties have deemed it binding. In such circumstances, the purported contract is often referred to as a mere „agreement agreement“ or a legally unenforceable negotiation agreement. On the other hand, if the parties have settled all the main conditions at issue and expressed their consent with sufficient certainty for the Tribunal to give it practical meaning, their consent is binding on them, even if a formal written document must then be drafted and signed. .
. .