The patient may be terminally ill, but this statement, apart from the repetition of other points, excludes the possibility that new treatments will be developed in time to cure the disease he or she is facing. Inequality in palliative care in places around the world is not enough to justify its circumvention. If so, the option not only reduces the growth in success that some palliative care has been able to avoid, but it will continue to prevent its growth. The legalization of physician-assisted suicide is only part of the debate about improving end-of-life care. It cannot be seen as a quick and simple solution or as a way to protect patients from inadequate care agreements. Too many people still suffer needlessly, often because doctors and families simply don`t know how to help people who die. The main problem is the lack of knowledge. Many suffer because doctors do not provide enough pain medication. Legalizing physician-assisted suicide would make real reform, such as better pain control, less likely. And ends up hurting the growth of the medical industry. Without the reform of painkillers, patients have no chance of living well in agony. In this scenario, the possibility of making suicide an option does not offer a real choice, but imposes on the patient, who again loses right-wing rights, presented by the Bejaoudis. [www.growthhouse.org/mortals/mort2526.html]] Whether or not a patient opts for a PAS, they have already made the decision to be an organ donor or not well before the procedure.

No correlation has been shown between the number of people who are willing to be organ donors when they have undergone PAS (Oregon Studies). We would also say that a boost for the organs would reduce the amount of care themselves with a PAS. Because now it is no longer the patient who is the center of attention, but his organs. In the status quo, people who are registered donors are sometimes held on to life (against their will, something we didn`t like) to determine the durability of organs for transplantation. Finally, when patients who have been released under the passport directives provided for in the proposal are already terminally ill and therefore already have failing organs that are not in good condition for transplantation. [www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/03/AR2007040302062.html]] In the medical profession, there is an inevitable problem with the prognosis of “terminal” patients. Many problems arise when doctors try to diagnose a disease that will be incurable or try to detect the final stages of a disease.